China'S Shoe Industry Needs To Rethink Its Efforts To Eradicate Anti-Dumping
China's shoe industry needs to rethink its efforts to eradicate anti-dumping Ben reporter Ma Pengfei From May 22nd onwards, Argentina Anti dumping war against China has been officially launched. The minimum reference price for all footwear products imported from China is the lowest FOB price per pair of shoes is $13.38. If the price of footwear imported from China is lower than the standard, the tariff will be levied according to the reference price. according to Ministry of industry and Tourism "5. 14" statement , This time China Shoe Anti dumping Final The validity period is 5 years. In order to protect The The shoe making industry in China. This is self. In 1995, the European footwear Federation filed anti-dumping investigations on leather and plastic shoes made in China. , Arbitration in February 28, 1998 , Dumping duty was abolished in 2003. Then another " 5 years of war " This year, the development of China's footwear market is described as "roller coaster". After just getting out of the financial crisis and depressed economy, it has not yet made enough effort to attack the world shoe industry, and it has ushered in a global "block". According to statistics, By the end of 3 this year, 152 cases of trade remedy measures launched by the European Union to China were among them. Among them, the EU has decided against China that the trade remedy measures being implemented will reach 56. Facing the global anti-dumping against Chinese footwear industry, How should China's shoe industry respond? Over the years, our strategy is nothing more than "three combinations, one action and two combinations". The Ministry of Commerce has negotiated, and the trade associations and shoemaking enterprises are responding together. Under such passive measures, China's footwear industry has endured nearly twenty years of international pressure. This is the moment when most shoe companies have become the critical juncture of climate transformation and upgrading. Global anti-dumping against China's footwear industry Again and again. On this unprecedented difficult time, China's footwear industry is a group. Why do we repeatedly accept the passive surrender in anti-dumping? Nearly 70% of the world's shoes are produced in China. Including leather shoes, cloth shoes, rubber shoes and plastic shoes, the total export volume of China's footwear last year amounted to 12 billion 500 million dollars, of which leather shoes accounted for more than 60%. In leather shoes industry, our country has a certain scale of production enterprises to 1.8, mainly concentrated in the provinces such as "the", "the" and so on, of which 2700 annual sales of more than 5 million yuan, only 1 million 360 thousand of these enterprises employees. According to international practice, any industry in any country is at the top of the world share. The industry will be in a monopolistic position, and it can restrict other entry by introducing industry norms. For example, although the US empire has encountered several antitrust accusations in the international arena, its hegemonistic position is unshakable, and its commercial interests are still good. Therefore, we must reflect on why China's shoe production share is absolutely dominant in the world, but the market is arbitrarily blocked by international people. Why can't we dominate the market? {page_break} Key words: shoe enterprises take back their shells and take root " With the gradual aging of European society, the industry began to decline. In 2004, there were two more than 200 enterprises in Spain, and only one left in 2005. Most of these enterprises are concentrated in the scale of 10 to 30 people. At present, the number of employees in China's footwear industry reaches about 2200000, with almost 20000 people alone. If we want to conquer the world, we must find an excellent partner. " In early 2008, when First brand 10000 Levi Reach Global strategic partnership Agreement And win the brand marketing and operation authorization of wanwade in the world. When, Wan Li Wei Dr. Armando Arcangeli I made such a speech. 。 China's shoe industry's overseas mergers and acquisitions "blowout" only Time lapse More than two years. 2010 In May 18th, the largest private shoe manufacturer in China. Just The signing of an agreement with the famous shoe brand Wanli wade to acquire the ownership of Wanli wade in Greater China. After the acquisition, Wanli Wade sold to China in the ownership of mainland China, Hong Kong, Macao and China, and according to the contract, more than ten patents from wanwade were shared. The Wanli shoe store shoe products under the banner will also be produced in the domestic market from the top 70%, 30% to 70%-80% in production, and 20%-30% in the high-end production line of HQ. From agency to ownership, from strategic cooperation to mergers and acquisitions 。 The overseas gold rush program can be step-by-step. Its real intention is to highlight the world. Acquiring the first brand in Greater China is only the first springboard to enter the international market. Its ultimate goal is to transfer production, take root and become a global brand. " At present, the company does not have the ability to send teams to take over Wanli Wade. Therefore, we first acquire the rights of Wanli Wade. " 。 The company did not buy Wanli Wade as a whole. In this regard, President of the group Like a mountain Express 。 This overseas merger has triggered a blowout in China's footwear industry. New round of overseas mergers and acquisitions of footwear enterprises On this Kick off. According to the industry, In mid June, more than 30 leather shoes and garment enterprises will go to the world to discuss cooperation with the world's first tier brands. Seeking acquisitions or capital injection to invest in these "old brand" brands. 。 Behind the "overseas M & a boom" is to avoid anti-dumping. Since 1980s, the focus of world footwear industry has shifted from Europe and North America to the Far East. China has become the focus of the world shoe industry transfer. Over the past 20 years, the accumulation of industrialization in China, especially in the eastern region, has brought Chinese enterprises to a new platform. , Some Chinese footwear enterprises already have the capability of global sourcing and global sales. Over the past twenty years, China's footwear industry has been in constant friction with the international community, and disputes are common. Why? Although China's footwear industry has strong and cheap labor support, It is unquestionable that any country must take measures when it is hit by the industry market. No matter what industry is monopolized or basically controlled by other nationalities, it is extremely dangerous for a nation. The chain reaction comes one after another, forming a vicious circle. The decline of the internationally developed international shoe making industry has led to worries about the footwear industry from the East, but the market needs the participation of the eastern footwear industry. Since 1995, China and Europe have seen some clues in the trade confrontation of footwear industry. From 1995 to 2005, the EU imposed a quota limit of 10 years on China's export of leather shoes. In September 17, 2004, a burning shoe incident occurred in the eastern city of Spain. In December 2004, the shoemaking association formally appealed to the European Commission for anti-dumping investigations against all footwear products exported to the EU. In June 30, 2005 and July 7th, the European Commission carried out anti-dumping investigation on China's labor safety shoes and some leather shoes. In October 7, 2006, the European Union formally launched a 2 year anti-dumping duty on leather shoes originating in China. In October 17, 2006, 5 enterprises, such as Mr Gao, filed an appeal in the European Court of justice on the grounds that the EU imposed anti-dumping duties on Chinese leather shoes. In October 2, 2008, the European Commission announced that the EU will temporarily maintain anti-dumping duties on leather shoes produced by the two countries as a result of the initiation of anti-dumping review procedures for leather shoes in China and Vietnam. The decision means that the EU's 16.5% year anti-dumping duty on leather shoes and children's shoes imported from China in 2006 will be extended for another 12 to 15 months. In December 22, 2009, the EU decided to extend the anti-dumping measures for another 15 months. In March 15, 2010, the EU Court ruled that 5 Chinese shoe companies were defeated, and the relevant enterprises later said they would continue appealing to the high court of the European Union. In April 20, 2010, the Chinese delegation formally requested the world trade organization to set up an expert group to investigate whether the EU anti-dumping measures against Chinese leather shoes violated international trade rules. ... " China and the EU should not be simple competition in the development of footwear industry, but the relationship between competition and cooperation, complementation and development. " 。 Xu Yong, honorary chairman of China Leather Association When discussing the trade frictions between China and Europe once Speaking. " China is not a competitor but a complementary partner. " Franco Balin, vice president of Footwear Manufacturers Association once Express 。 The shoe industry in China has turned to the old shoe industry overseas. First, it shows the growth period of twenty years. The vast majority of China's footwear industry has completed the stage of original accumulation and entrepreneurship. Now it has entered the mode of product upgrading and meticulous management of enterprises. The two point is that Chinese shoe enterprises have long been tired of international anti-dumping. Well, that's the best example. In October 17, 2006, 5 enterprises in the EU and the EU filed an appeal in the European Court of justice on the grounds that the EU imposed anti-dumping duties on Chinese leather shoes. Why The famous brand of shoe and shoe industry The progress of cooperation is as fast as lightning, from agent to merger for two years. In the final analysis, we need to take the name of "foreign brand" to dominate the European and American markets and avoid international anti-dumping. As you can see, Chinese shoe enterprises have already seen collective Tired of the global shoe market. Artificial suppression policy, behind the "overseas M & a fever", is to avoid anti-dumping. Years of blood and tears prove that international Agreements, commitments, memorandums of economic cooperation between countries, and so on, will stop before national interests. Therefore, trade friction will continue for a shoe exporter, the largest exporter in the world, with strong and cheap support. In the era of peace, the threat to a national industry is no less than a war launched by a country in the war years. Therefore, if the Chinese footwear industry wants to avoid international anti-dumping in the future, it must carry out its own brand by "foreign brand". Only in this context can the international market give more room for development. Otherwise, it can only be a squid and be slaughtered. {page_break} Key words: lack of government control China's shoe industry's international market has been constantly rubbing against anti-dumping, which is not only related to the international worries and the control of the shoe industry, but also to artificially suppress the Chinese footwear industry. Market monitoring imbalance Look at China Shoe products market Products Homogenization phenomenon Has reached the level of human spirit. Many shoe companies plagiarize me, I imitate you, resulting in a worsening market environment. Some shoe companies invest a lot of money and energy in R & D, strive to create unique products with new technology to win the favor of consumers, but are unscrupulously grabbed by some unearned shoe companies, and then use these technologies to make profiteering on their products, and those shoe manufacturers that have worked hard to create technological achievements fail to apply for intellectual property protection, so they can no longer lose their dominant resources. Xie A shoe store in Xian County Blatantly " Red golden fly Beside " Red Dragonfly In the name of "selling cottage shoes", wholesalers and sales outlets such as those who disrupted the market even appeared in all kinds of cottage shoes, including sales of all kinds of cottage shoes. It is the government's efforts to crack down on Shanzhai shoes, or even acquiesce in its survival, that leads to the existence of rampant shoemaking enterprises. This shift has helped to create the trend of cloning between shoe companies. In the international market, the anti dumping market is booming and the homogeneity of the domestic market is serious. The government should introduce policies to regulate the industry, promote the growth of the legal system and technical standards of the industry, and curb and control the growth of homogenization. Lack of policy guidance